REFERENCES Amato, P.R. 2000. The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family 62(4): 1269-1287Amato, P.R. 2010. Research on divorce: continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family 72(3): 650-666Amato, P.R. and S. James. 2010. Divorce in Europe and the United States: commonalities and differences across nations. Family Science 1(1): 2-13Angrist, J.D. 2002. How do sex ratios affect marriage and labor markets? Evidence from America´s second generation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(3): 997-1038Bauer, G. and M. Jacob. 2009. The Influence of Partners Education on Family Formation. Mannheim: University of Mannheim. (Equalsoc working paper 2009(4))Beck-Gernsheim, E. 2011. The marriage route to migration: of border artists, transnational matchmaking and imported spouses. Nordic Journal of Migration Research 1(2): 60-68Beller, E. 2009. Bringing intergenerational social mobility research into the twenty-first century: why mothers matter. American Sociological Review 74(4): 507-528Billari, F.C. and H.-P. Kohler. 2004. Patterns of low and lowest-low fertility in Europe. Population Studies 58(2): 161-176Blossfeld, H.-P. 2009. Educational assortative marriage in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology 35: 513-530Blossfeld, H.-P. and A. Timm. 2003. Who Marries Whom? Educational Systems as Marriage Markets in Modern Societies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic PublishersBlossfeld, H.-P. and S. Drobnic, eds. 2001. Careers of Couples in Contemporary Society. From Male Breadwinner to Dual-Earner Families. Oxford: Oxford University PressBradley, Karen. 2000. The incorporation of women into higher education: paradoxical outcomes? Sociology of Education 73(1): 1-18Brown, C. and M. Corcoran. 1997. Sex-based differences in school content and the Male-Female Wage Gap. Journal of Labor Economics 15(3): 431-465Buchmann, C. and T. A. DiPrete. 2006. The growing female advantage in college completion: the role of family background and academic achievement. American Sociological Review 71(4): 515-541Buchmann, C., T.A. DiPrete and A. McDaniel. 2008. Gender inequalities in education. Annual Review of Sociology 34: 319-337Celikaksoy, A., H. Nielsen and M. Verner. 2006. Marriage migration: just another case of positive assortative mating? Review of Economics of the Household 4(3): 253-275Charles, M. and K. Bradley. 2002. Equal but separate? A cross-national study of sex segregation in higher education. American Sociological Review 67(4): 573-599Cohen, J.E. 2008. Make secondary education universal. Nature 456: 572-573Cooke, L.P. 2004. The gendered division of labor and family outcomes in Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(5): 1246-1259Cooke, L.P. 2009. Gender equity and fertility in Italy and Spain. Journal of Social Policy 38(1): 123-140Corijn, M., A.C. Liefbroer and J. de Jong Gierveld. 1996. It takes two to tango, doesn´t it? The influence of couple characteristics on the timing of the birth of the first child. Journal of Marriage and the Family 58(1): 117-126Crowder, K.D. and S.E. Tolnay. 2000. A new marriage squeeze for black women: the role of racial intermarriage by black men. Journal of Marriage and Family 62(3): 792-807Dewilde, C. and W. Uunk. 2008. Remarriage as a Way to Overcome the Financial Consequences of Divorce. European Sociological Review 24(3): 393-407DiPrete, T.A. and C. Buchmann. 2006. Gender-specific trends in the value of education and the emerging gender gap in college completion. Demography 43(1): 1-24Dykstra, P. and A.-R. Poortman. 2010. Economic resources and remaining single: trends over time. European Sociological Review 26(3): 277-290Esteve, A., J. Garcia and I. Permanyer. 2011. The reversal of the gender gap in eduation and its impact on union formation: the end of hypergamy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America 2011European Commission. 2009. Women in Science. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European CommunitiesEuropean Commission. 2010. Report on Equality Between Women and Men. Luxembourg: European UnionGibson-Davis, C.M. 2009. Money, marriage, and children: testing the financial expectations and family formation theory. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(1): 146-160Goldman, N. and M. Montgomery. 1989. Fecundability and husbands age. Social Biology 36(3-4): 146-166Goldstein, J.R. and C.T. Kenney. 2001. Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review 66(4): 506-519Guttentag, M. and P.F. Secord. 1983. Too many women? The sex ratio question. Beverly Hills, CA: SageHarknett, K. 2008. Mate availability and unmarried parent relationships. Demography 45(3): 555-571Howarth, J. 1994. Chapter 13. Women. In The History of the University of Oxford: The Twentieth Century, ed. B. Harrison, 345-376. Oxford: Oxford University PressHuber, S. and M. Fieder. 2011. Educational homogamy lowers the odds of reproductive failure. PLoS 6(7): 1-6Huijts, T., C.W. Monden and G. Kraaykamp. 2010. Education, educational heterogamy, and self-assessed health in Europe. European Sociological Review 26(3): 261-276Härkönen, J. and J. Dronkers. 2006. Stability and change in the educational gradient of divorce. A comparison of seventeen countries. European Sociological Review 22(5): 501-517Isen, A. and B. Stevenson. 2010. Womens Education and Family Behavior: Trends in Marriage, Divorce and Fertility. In Demography and the Economy, ed. J.B. Shoven. Chicago: University of Chicago PressJalovaara, M. 2012. Socio-economic resources and first-union formation in Finland, cohorts born 1969-81. Population Studies 66(1): 69-85Jurajda, S. 2003. Gender wage gap and segregation in enterprises and the public sector in late transition countries. Journal of Comparative Economics 31(2): 199-222KC, S., B. Barakat, A. Goujon, V. Skirbekk, W. Sanderson and W. Lutz. 2010. Projection of populations by level of educational attainment, age, and sex for 120 countries for 2005-2050. Demographic Research 22(15): 383-472Kalmijn, M. 1991(a). Shifting Boundaries: Trends in Religious and Educational Homogamy. American Sociological Review 56(6): 786-800Kalmijn, M. 1991(b). Status Homogamy in the United States. American Journal of Sociology 97(2): 496-523Kalmijn, M. 1993. Spouse selection among the children of European immigrants: a comparison of marriage cohorts in the 1960 census. International Migration Review 27(1): 51-78Kalmijn, M. 1998. Intermarriage and homogamy. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 395- 421Kalmijn, M. 2007. Explaining cross-national differences in marriage, cohabitation, and divorce in Europe, 1990-2000. Population Studies 61(3): 243-263Kofman, E. 2004. Family-related migration: a critical review of European studies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 30(2): 243-262Kravdal, Ø. 1999. Does marriage require a stronger economic underpinning than informal cohabitation. Population Studies 53(1): 63-80Kravdal, Ø. and R.R. Rindfuss. 2008. Changing relationships between education and fertility a study of women and men born 1940-64. American Sociological Review 73(5): 854-873Köppen, K. 2006. Second births in western Germany and France. Demographic Research 14(14): 295-330Lichter, D.T., F.B. LeClere and D.K. McLaughlin. 1992. Local marriage markets and the marital behavior of black and white women. American Journal of Sociology 96(4): 843-867Lievens, J. 1999. Family-forming migration from Turkey and Morocco to Belgium: the demand for marriage partners from the countries of origin. International Migration Review 33(3): 717-744Lutz, W., A. Goujon and G. Doblhammer-Reiter. 1998. Demographic dimensions in forecasting: adding education to age and sex. Population and Development Review 24(Supplement): 42-58Lutz, W., A. Goujon, S. K.C. and W. Sanderson. 2007. Reconstruction of population by age, sex and level of educational attainment of 120 countries for 1970-2000. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2007(5): 193-235Lutz, W., J.C. Cuaresma and W. Sanderson. 2008. The demography of educational attainment and economic growth. Science 319(5866): 1047-1048Machin, S. and P.A. Puhani. 2003. Subject of degree and the gender wage differential: evidence from the UK and Germany. Economics Letters 79(3): 393-400Mandel, H. and M. Semyonov. 2006. A welfare state paradox: state interventions and womens employment opportunities in 22 countries. American Journal of Sociology 111(6): 1910-1949Mare, R.D. 1991. Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review 56(1): 15-32Mascie-Taylor, C.G.N. 1986. Assortative mating and differential fertility. Biology and Society 3(4): 167-70Matorras, R., F. Matorras, A. Exposito, L. Martinez and L. Crisol. 2011. Decline in human fertility rates with male age: a consequence of a decrease in male fecundity with aging? Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 71(4): 229-235McDaniel, A. 2010. The Gender Gap in Higher Education in Europe: the Impact of Individual and National Characteristics. Ohio State Univ., unpubl. working paperMcDonald, P. 2000. Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review 26(3): 427-439McLanahan, S. 2004. Diverging destinies: how children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography 41(4): 607-627Myrskylä, M., H.-P. Kohler and F.C. Billari. 2011. High Development and Fertility: Fertility at Older Reproductive Ages and Gender Equality Explain the Positive Link. Rostock, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. (MPIDR Working Paper WP 2011-017.)Myrskylä, M., H.-P. Kohler, and F.C. Billari. 2009. Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature 460(6 August): 741-743Oppenheimer, V.K. 1988. A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology 94(3): 563-591Rindfuss, R.R. and A. VandenHeuvel. 1990 . Cohabitation: a precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single. Population and Development Review 16(4): 703-726Rose, E. 2004. Education and Hypergamy in Marriage Markets. Washington, WA: Center for Research on Families, University of Washington. (Center for Research on Families Working Paper 2004-01.)Rosina, A. and M.R. Testa. 2009. Couples first child intentions and disagreement: an analysis of the Italian case. European Journal of Population 25(4): 487-502Schoen, R. 1983. Measuring the tightness of the marriage squeeze. Demography 20(1): 61-78Schofer, E. and J.W. Meyer. 2005. The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review 70(6): 898-920Schwartz, C.R. and R.D. Mare. 2005. Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography 42(4): 621-646Shafer, K.M. 2009. Gender Differences in Remarriage: Marriage Formation and Assortative Mating After Divorce. PhD diss., Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OhioSobotka, T and L. Toulemon. 2008. Overview Chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research 19(6): 85-138Sobotka, T. 2004. Is lowest-low fertility in Europe explained by the postponement of childbearing? Population and Development Review 30(2): 195-220Soons, J.P.M., A.C. Liefbroer and M. Kalmijn. 2009. The long-term consequences of relationship formation for subjective well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(5): 1254-1270South, S.J., K. Trent and Y. Shen. 2001. Changing partners: towards a macrostructuralopportunity theory of marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and the Family 63(3): 743-754Sweeney, M.M. and M. Cancian. 2004. The changing importance of white womans economic prospects for assortative mating. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 1015-1028Teachman, J.D. 2002. Stability across cohorts in divorce risk factors Demography 39(2): 331-351Thomson, E. 1990. Two in one: structural models of couple behaviour. In Family Variables: Conceptualization, Measurement and Use, ed. C.W. Draper and A.C. Marcos, 129-142. Newbury Park, CA: SageThomson, E. 2001. Family size preferences. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 5347-5350. Amsterdam: ElsevierThomson, E., E. McDonald, and L. Bumpass. 1990. Fertility desires and fertility. Demography 27(4): 579-588Timmerman, C. 2008. Marriage in a culture of migration. Emirdag marrying into Flanders. European Review 16(4): 585-594Torr, B.M. and S.E. Short. 2004. Second births and the second shift: a research note on gender equity and fertility. Population and Development Review 30(1): 109-130Van Bavel, J. 2010. Choice of study discipline and the postponement of motherhood in Europe: the impact of expected earnings, gender composition and family attitudes, Demography 47(2): 439-458Van Bavel, J. and J. Rozanska-Putek. 2010. Second birth rates across Europe: childcare as a mediator of the effect of womens level of education. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2010(8): 107-138Van Bavel, J., M. Jansen and B. Wijckmans. 2012. Has divorce become a pro-natal force in Europe at the turn of the 21st century? Population Research and Policy ReviewVan de Putte, B., F. van Poppel, S. Vanassche et al.. 2009. The rise of age homogamy in 19th century Western Europe. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(5): 1234-1253Vincent-Lancrin, S. 2008. The Reversal of Gender Inequalities in Higher Education: an Ongoing Trend. In Higher Education to 2030: Demography, 265-98. Paris: OECDVoas, D. 2004. Conflicting preferences: a reason fertility tends to be too high or too low Population and Development Review 29(4): 627-646West, C. and D. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender and Society 1(2): 125-151Wilson, K.L. and J.P. Boldizar. 1990. Gender segregation in higher education: effects of aspirations, mathematics achievement, and income. Sociology of Education 63(1): 62-74de Graaf, P.M. and M. Kalmijn. 2003. Alternative routes in the remarriage market: competing-risk analyses of union formation after divorce. Social Forces 81(4): 1459- 1496