![]() |
Symposion 2017Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte (Tel Aviv, 20.- 23. August 2017)
|
![]() |
Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400 https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
DATUM, UNTERSCHRIFT / DATE, SIGNATURE
BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT, WIEN (IBAN AT04 1100 0006 2280 0100, BIC BKAUATWW), DEUTSCHE BANK MÜNCHEN (IBAN DE16 7007 0024 0238 8270 00, BIC DEUTDEDBMUC)
|

Symposion 2017, pp. 211-250, 2019/02/27
Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte (Tel Aviv, 20.- 23. August 2017)
Due to the sources, beside the parties’ names and the demanded penalty (timema), a plaint (enklema) contained the description of the matter of fact (pragma) and the rule (nomos) that, according to the claimant, had been violated by the defendant. This pattern (that could also fit with the basic structure of the Roman actiones) shows that it were the parties who, when preparing an action and therefore writing an enklema, had to suggest in which way the opponent’s behaviour had violated which law.
Keywords: enklema, subsumption, anakrisis, procedure in iure, epigramma